Skip to main content
Category

Car Accident

Delivery driver dropping off a package

Hurt in an Amazon Delivery Driver Accident?

By Car Accident, Pedestrian Accident, Truck Accident, Wrongful Death

The Rise of Delivery Crashes in Arizona

Amazon packages arrive at lightning speed—but sometimes, safety gets left behind.

In Arizona, multiple lawsuits have been filed against Amazon after individuals were injured by drivers delivering packages. These cases highlight a growing issue: rapid delivery demands mixed with potentially unvetted or undertrained drivers on the road.

One Arizona woman claims she was struck by an Amazon van while walking in her neighborhood. Another was injured when a delivery driver ran a red light. Both victims allege that Amazon and its delivery partners failed to ensure their drivers were properly trained and qualified. These cases may signal a troubling trend—and a need for accountability.

Who Is Responsible?

When a crash involves a delivery driver, figuring out who is liable is not always straightforward. In Arizona, delivery services like Amazon often partner with third-party contractors called “Delivery Service Partners” (DSPs). This can make it difficult to determine who bears legal responsibility—the driver, the DSP, or Amazon itself.

However, if Amazon knew (or should have known) that a delivery partner was hiring unsafe drivers, they may share some of the blame. This is where a legal concept called negligent hiring or negligent supervision comes into play.

A personal injury attorney can investigate:

  • Whether the driver had a history of violations

  • If they were properly trained and licensed

  • Whether delivery deadlines encouraged unsafe behavior

  • How much oversight Amazon exercised over the delivery company

What To Do After a Delivery Driver Hits You

If you are ever injured in an accident involving a delivery vehicle, here are a few important steps:

Why Hire Fielding Law

At Fielding Law, we understand how overwhelming it can feel to go up against a massive company like Amazon. That is why we focus on supporting individuals—not corporations. We know how to investigate these crashes, uncover evidence, and fight for the compensation you deserve.

If you or someone you love was injured in an accident with a delivery driver, do not wait.

Call 833.88.SHARK or contact Fielding Law today for a free consultation.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

Tesla on a street using autopilot

Tesla Autopilot Trial Raises New Questions

By Car Accident, Personal Injury, Product Liability, Wrongful Death

A Tragic Crash Now in Court

A federal jury in Miami is hearing a high-profile wrongful death case involving Tesla. The lawsuit stems from a fatal 2019 crash in Key Largo, Florida. According to reports, a Tesla Model S on Autopilot struck a parked SUV at highway speed. The impact killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo.

This case is especially notable because the victims were standing outside the vehicle. Most previous lawsuits involving Tesla’s Autopilot have come from passengers or drivers. This one could expand how courts view third-party claims.

Legal Claims Against Tesla

The plaintiffs argue that Tesla’s Autopilot system was defective and improperly marketed. They claim the company allowed drivers to use the system in areas where it was not safe. For example, they say Tesla failed to use geofencing to limit Autopilot to highways.

They also assert that Tesla gave the public a false sense of security. A 2016 promotional video showed a Tesla navigating city streets on its own. However, the company later admitted the video was staged. The plaintiffs now use this as evidence of misleading marketing.

Judge Beth Bloom allowed the jury to consider punitive damages. This decision suggests the court sees possible reckless behavior on Tesla’s part.

What the Data Reveals

Tesla denies any wrongdoing. However, the plaintiffs say the company withheld crash data that could show how Autopilot performed during the crash. They claim Tesla’s refusal to share logs raises concerns about transparency.

In addition, the driver of the Tesla, George McGee, admitted that he looked down to pick up his phone right before the crash. He also pressed the accelerator, which may have disengaged Autopilot. Despite this, the plaintiffs argue the system should have intervened. They say Autopilot could have detected the hazard and stopped the car in time.

Why This Case Matters

This trial could reshape how courts handle lawsuits involving advanced driver-assistance systems. It challenges both Tesla’s technology and its responsibility to the public. If the jury rules against Tesla, it could encourage stricter safety rules for semi-autonomous vehicles.

Federal agencies like NHTSA are already investigating Tesla’s self-driving features. A verdict in favor of the plaintiffs could push regulators to act more aggressively. It may also open the door for more third-party injury claims in the future.

What Victims and Families Should Know

Victims of crashes involving driver-assistance systems face unique legal challenges. These cases often require deep investigation. Attorneys must analyze crash logs, sensor data, driver behavior, and manufacturer decisions.

Fielding Law works with industry experts to uncover what went wrong. Whether a crash happened in California or Arizona, we can help you understand your legal options. Our team knows how to navigate claims involving complex vehicle technology.

Why Hire Fielding Law

At Fielding Law, we offer ethical, effective, and compassionate legal representation. We stay informed about emerging legal issues in vehicle automation and product liability. When a company’s negligence causes harm, we are here to fight for accountability.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries in a crash involving a semi-autonomous vehicle, you deserve answers. Contact Fielding Law at 833.88.SHARK today for a free consultation.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

modified cars on the road with aftermarket parts

What Makes Aftermarket Roll Cages Risky?

By Car Accident

A roll cage is meant to protect passengers in the event of a crash or rollover. While factory-installed roll cages meet strict safety standards, aftermarket options often do not. These modifications can create more harm than good.

Poor Design Can Cause Injury

Manufacturers of aftermarket roll cages do not always follow federal safety standards. The wrong materials or design flaws can lead to:

  • Weak Structures – Inferior materials may not withstand impact.
  • Sharp Edges – Poorly welded joints can cause serious injuries.
  • Bad Mounting Points – Incorrect attachment can make a crash worse.

Installation Errors Make Roll Cages Dangerous

Even a well-designed roll cage can be dangerous if installed incorrectly. Common installation mistakes include:

  • Improper Welds – Weak connections can fail under stress.
  • Blocked Airbags – Some roll cages interfere with built-in safety features.
  • Reduced Crumple Zones – The car’s ability to absorb impact may be compromised.

Who Is Liable for a Faulty Roll Cage?

If a mechanic or shop installs a faulty roll cage, they may be responsible for any injuries that result. A manufacturer could also be liable if the cage was defective. However, proving fault is not always simple. Liability depends on the installation, materials, and how the accident occurred. Seeking legal guidance can help determine who is responsible.

Why Hire Fielding Law?

At Fielding Law, we understand the risks of vehicle modifications and how they impact injury claims. Our experienced team fights for those harmed by defective parts and negligent installations. Contact us today at 833.88.SHARK for a free consultation.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

Roadway Workers at a jobsite with safety gear on

How Tow Truck Drivers and Roadside Workers Can Stay Safe on Roadways

By Car Accident, Catastrophic Injury, Pedestrian Accident, Personal Injury, Public Entity, Wrongful Death

Working on or near roadways can be a dangerous task for tow truck drivers, landscapers, and other professionals. With traffic speeding by, it is essential to follow strict safety protocols to minimize the risk of accidents and injuries. Understanding roadway safety for workers is crucial to keeping workers safe while they perform their duties near moving vehicles. The following safety tips are essential for anyone working in these high-risk environments.

1. Always Wear High-Visibility Clothing

Wearing high-visibility clothing is crucial for any worker near traffic. Bright vests, jackets, or shirts with reflective strips ensure you are seen by drivers, particularly during low-light conditions like dawn or dusk. Roadway safety for workers starts with visibility, so make sure to wear proper gear to reduce the chances of an accident.

2. Use Warning Signals and Signs

Proper warning signals, such as reflective cones, flares, and signage, are essential for alerting drivers about work zones. Tow trucks should activate emergency lights, and workers should set up warning triangles or other visibility markers to enhance safety. Implementing these roadway safety for workers measures is key to reducing the risk of accidents.

3. Work with a Spotter

Whenever possible, have a spotter to help guide traffic and ensure workers remain safe. Spotters can signal when it is safe for workers to proceed and warn them of approaching vehicles, improving overall safety.

4. Set Up a Safe Work Zone

Creating a safe work zone is crucial to keeping workers out of harm’s way. Positioning vehicles in such a way that shields workers from traffic and using barriers or other protective measures can greatly reduce the risk of accidents.

5. Keep a Safe Distance from Moving Traffic

Workers should remain as far from moving traffic as possible. When working on the shoulder of a highway or in active lanes, it is vital to stay within designated work zones and avoid standing in traffic lanes.

6. Ensure Vehicles Are Properly Equipped

Tow trucks and other work vehicles should have safety features like reflective materials, warning lights, and properly secured equipment. These measures help make workers more visible and reduce the risk of accidents.

7. Always Be Aware of Your Surroundings

Maintaining awareness of the environment around you is essential for staying safe. Workers should avoid distractions and continuously monitor approaching vehicles, potential hazards, and any changes in road conditions.

8. Ensure Proper Training

Proper training is essential for anyone working on or near roadways. Tow truck drivers, landscapers, and other professionals should be well-versed in traffic laws, safety protocols, and how to handle hazardous situations.

9. Avoid Working in Bad Weather

Bad weather significantly increases the risk of accidents. Tow truck drivers and roadside workers should avoid working during conditions like heavy rain, fog, or snow unless absolutely necessary. When working in adverse weather, extra precautions should be taken.

10. Be Prepared for Emergencies

Emergencies can arise, even with all precautions in place. Tow truck drivers and roadside workers should be familiar with emergency first-aid procedures and know how to respond in case of an accident.

Why Hire Fielding Law?

If you are a roadside worker who has been injured in an accident while working near traffic, Fielding Law is here to help. Our attorneys are experienced in handling traffic-related injury cases and can help you secure the compensation you deserve. We understand the unique risks that come with working on or near roadways, and we are dedicated to helping you through the legal process. Contact us today at 833.88.SHARK for a free consultation.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

interior of an autonomous car with a large screen on the dashboard.

Who Is Liable in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents?

By Car Accident

As autonomous vehicles (AVs) become more prevalent on the roads, questions about legal responsibility in accidents involving self-driving technology are gaining attention. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched investigations into Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” software following multiple crashes, highlighting the legal complexities of these cases. Understanding liability, regulatory frameworks, and potential legal claims can help individuals navigate this evolving landscape.

Who Is Liable in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents?

Determining liability in AV accidents can be challenging, as multiple parties may share responsibility. Some key potential liable parties include:

  • The Vehicle Manufacturer: If a defect in the self-driving software or hardware contributed to the crash, the manufacturer may be held liable under product liability laws.
  • The Human Driver: Many AVs still require human supervision. If a driver failed to intervene appropriately, they might be responsible for the accident.
  • Software Developers: If flaws in the AV’s artificial intelligence or software updates caused the crash, the developers could be at fault.
  • Government and Regulatory Bodies: In some cases, failures in infrastructure, traffic signals, or regulations might contribute to an accident, raising questions of government liability.

Legal Challenges in AV Accidents

Autonomous vehicle accidents present unique legal challenges, including:

  • Proving Fault: Traditional auto accident claims rely on driver negligence, but AV incidents may involve complex software malfunctions and AI decision-making.
  • Insurance Considerations: Insurance policies may need to adapt to determine coverage for AV-related crashes, especially when human intervention is minimal.
  • State and Federal Regulations: Laws regarding AV liability vary by state, and federal guidelines continue to evolve as technology advances.
  • Data and Evidence: AVs collect vast amounts of data, which can be used in legal claims. However, accessing and interpreting this data can be complex.

What Should You Do After an Autonomous Vehicle Accident?

If you are involved in an accident with an AV, consider taking the following steps:

  1. Seek Medical Attention: Your health and safety should always be the top priority.
  2. Document the Scene: Take photos, collect witness statements, and gather any available data from the vehicle.
  3. Report the Accident: Notify law enforcement and obtain an official accident report.
  4. Contact Fielding Law: Given the complexities of AV accidents, consulting a personal injury attorney can help protect your rights and explore legal options.

Why Hire Fielding Law?

At Fielding Law, we understand the complexities of personal injury cases involving cutting-edge technology. Our team is committed to advocating for accident victims and ensuring they receive the compensation they deserve. If you have been involved in an autonomous vehicle accident, contact Fielding Law today at 833.88.SHARK to discuss your case.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

Aerial view of a possible traffic accident in venice beach

Traffic Accident Myths That Could Hurt Your Injury Claim

By Car Accident, Personal Injury

Understanding Traffic Accident Myths and Their Impact

Traffic accidents are stressful and confusing experiences. After a crash, many people believe common traffic accident myths that can hurt their injury claims or delay recovery. At Fielding Law, we want to clear up some of the most frequent misconceptions so you can make informed decisions and protect your rights.

Myth 1: If I Am Partly at Fault, I Cannot Recover Compensation

One widespread traffic accident myth is that partial fault means you lose the right to compensation. This is not true in most states, including California and Arizona. Both states use comparative fault rules, meaning you can still recover damages even if you share some responsibility. However, your compensation might be reduced based on your percentage of fault.

Myth 2: Minor Accidents Do Not Require Legal Help

Another common myth is that you do not need a lawyer for a minor accident. Some injuries, such as concussions or soft tissue damage, may show symptoms later. Insurance companies often offer quick settlements to close cases before victims fully understand their injuries. Having an attorney ensures you receive fair compensation for all damages.

Myth 3: Talking to the Insurance Adjuster Helps Speed Up the Process

Many believe that speaking to the insurance adjuster will help their claim process. In reality, adjusters work for the insurance company and may use your statements to minimize or deny your claim. It is best to consult with an experienced injury attorney before giving any statements or accepting settlements.

Myth 4: You Must Wait for the Police Report Before Filing a Claim

While the police report is an important piece of evidence, you do not have to wait for it to take action. Promptly contacting a lawyer can help preserve evidence and strengthen your case, increasing your chances of a successful claim.

Myth 5: Settling Quickly Is Always Better

Quick settlements may seem convenient but often lead to inadequate compensation for injuries, lost wages, or future medical needs. This myth can cost you dearly. It is vital to fully understand your rights and the extent of your damages before agreeing to any settlement offer.

Why Choose Fielding Law for Your Traffic Accident Case

Navigating traffic accident claims can be complicated and overwhelming. At Fielding Law, we provide compassionate, skilled guidance to help you understand your options and fight for the compensation you deserve. Our team handles your case with professionalism, civility, and kindness from start to finish.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a traffic accident caused by someone else, contact Fielding Law for a free consultation. Call 833.88.SHARK today to speak with our experienced team.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

person filing a claim with paperwork on a desk

Can Immigrants File an Injury Claim?

By Bicycle Accident, Car Accident, Personal Injury, Slip or Trip and Fall

You Have the Right to File a Claim

If you are an immigrant—documented or undocumented—and you were injured in California or Arizona due to someone else’s negligence, you still have the legal right to file a personal injury claim. Immigration status does not affect your eligibility to seek compensation for your injuries, medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.

This protection applies whether you were injured in a car crash, slip and fall, bicycle accident, or other incident. In fact, it is your legal right to pursue an immigrant injury claim in both states.

What You Need to File a Claim

Filing a personal injury claim involves several key steps, no matter your immigration status:

  • Seek Medical Care Immediately
    Prioritize your health. Emergency room records and follow-up visits provide essential proof of your injuries.

  • Document the Incident
    Gather names, contact information, witness details, and photos of the accident scene and injuries.

  • Report the Incident
    Whether it is a car crash or a workplace injury, make sure an official report is filed.

  • Keep a Record of All Expenses
    This includes medical bills, prescriptions, lost wages, and anything else related to the injury.

  • Do Not Let Fear Hold You Back
    California and Arizona courts do not ask about your immigration status in personal injury cases. Your legal status will not be used against you in court when filing an immigrant injury claim.

Common Myths That Hold Immigrants Back

Many injured immigrants avoid pursuing claims because of fear or misinformation. Here are some myths—followed by the truth:

  • Myth: “I will be reported to immigration authorities.”
    Truth: Personal injury lawsuits are civil cases. Immigration enforcement is not involved in civil court claims.

  • Myth: “I cannot sue if I do not have a Social Security number.”
    Truth: You do not need a Social Security number to pursue a personal injury case. Other forms of identification or documentation can be used.

  • Myth: “Hiring a lawyer will expose my immigration status.”
    Truth: Your conversations with a personal injury lawyer are private. At Fielding Law, your privacy and safety are our priority.

Why Hire Fielding Law

At Fielding Law, we believe everyone deserves justice—regardless of immigration status. We treat our clients with empathy, kindness, and professionalism. Our boutique firm focuses solely on personal injury law, and we fight hard to protect your rights while helping you feel secure every step of the way. You will never be judged here. You will be heard, respected, and supported.

If you or a loved one was injured, call 833.88.SHARK or contact Fielding Law for a free consultation. We speak your language, understand your concerns, and are ready to help with your immigrant injury claim.

Personal Injury Laws in California and Arizona

Both California and Arizona allow injury victims—regardless of immigration status—to seek damages. In fact, California law specifically states that a person’s immigration status is not relevant in determining compensation for lost wages or medical costs (Evidence Code §351.2).

Arizona does not have a statute that addresses this directly, but state and federal courts have consistently upheld that undocumented immigrants still have standing to sue for personal injury.

You Deserve Help. We Can Provide It.

Immigrants contribute so much to their communities—and they deserve to feel safe and protected. If you are searching for help with an immigrant injury claim, the law is on your side. Let Fielding Law guide you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

blinding bright headlights

Blinded by Bright Headlights?

By Bicycle Accident, Car Accident, Catastrophic Injury, E-Bikes and E-Scooters, Motorcycle Accident, Pedestrian Accident, Personal Injury, Truck Accident, Wrongful Death

Are Headlights Getting Brighter?

Yes—they are. It is not your imagination. Modern vehicles, especially larger trucks and SUVs, are now equipped with brighter, bluer, and higher headlights than in the past. A recent KTLA article highlighted how road glare from these newer lights is becoming a growing safety concern for drivers across the country.

Older vehicles used halogen bulbs emitting about 1,000 lumens. But starting in the early 2000s, many manufacturers switched to LED headlights, which can emit 4,000 lumens or more. Aftermarket bulbs—often installed without proper regulation—can reach 10,000 lumens or higher.

The result? Drivers are facing intense glare, often directly at eye level, thanks to the combination of brighter lights and elevated vehicle designs.

What Makes These Lights So Dangerous?

According to experts like Jillian Young from AAA Northeast, the intense bluish-white hue of LEDs is more irritating to the human eye than traditional warmer halogen lights. This discomfort increases the chance of temporary blindness, slow reaction time, and even complete disorientation—especially on dark roads.

These lights are often angled higher, especially on large SUVs and lifted trucks, causing them to shine directly into the eyes of other drivers. Oncoming glare can cause:

  • Difficulty seeing lane lines or obstacles

  • Delayed reaction time

  • Temporary visual impairment or “flash blindness”

  • Increased risk of veering or swerving into other lanes

Can You Sue Someone for Blinding You with Headlights?

In both California and Arizona, it is difficult—but not impossible—to bring a claim based solely on being blinded by someone’s headlights. The core issue comes down to negligence.

To bring a successful lawsuit, you must prove:

  1. The other driver acted unreasonably or unlawfully (such as installing illegal aftermarket lights or failing to dim high beams).

  2. Their action caused a crash or injury.

  3. You suffered actual harm or damages as a result.

For example, if a driver had illegally bright or modified headlights, and that glare caused you to crash or collide with another object, you may have a valid claim. You could potentially file against:

  • The other driver, if their headlights were modified or improperly used.

  • A third party, such as a body shop that installed unapproved lighting equipment.

  • Even vehicle manufacturers, if defective headlights contributed to a hazardous situation (in rare product liability cases).

However, glare-related crashes are often complex. You will need strong evidence, such as:

  • Eyewitness statements

  • Dash cam footage

  • Vehicle inspection records

  • Police reports noting lighting modifications or misuse

These claims can also become more viable if the other party was cited for violating headlight laws.

What Do California and Arizona Laws Say?

California and Arizona both have headlight laws, but enforcement is inconsistent.

In California:

  • Vehicle headlights must not project “a glaring light” to oncoming drivers.

  • Headlight height and brightness are regulated, but aftermarket LED kits can often slip through inspections.

  • Police may cite drivers for violations of Vehicle Code § 24409 (failure to dim high beams) or § 25950 (improper lighting).

In Arizona:

  • A.R.S. § 28-947 requires proper adjustment of headlights to prevent glare.

  • Brightness limits exist, but there is no widely enforced lumen cap.

  • Modifying factory lighting beyond its intended performance may be illegal.

Despite these laws, citations for overly bright headlights are rare, and few cases make it to court unless a crash occurs.

How to Protect Yourself

While the law slowly catches up to lighting technology, you can take steps to protect yourself:

  • Avoid looking directly at oncoming lights. Instead, focus slightly right of the road.

  • Use night mode or anti-glare coatings on mirrors or glasses.

  • Dim your rearview mirror when bright lights are behind you.

  • Install a dash cam in case you are injured and need evidence of excessive glare.

  • Have your eyes checked regularly. Nighttime sensitivity can worsen with age or uncorrected vision problems.

Why Hire Fielding Law

If you were involved in a crash and believe glare or illegal headlights played a role, we are here to help. At Fielding Law, we investigate every detail—down to the headlight specifications and the manufacturer’s compliance.

Our team understands how devastating glare-related collisions can be. We will work with accident reconstruction experts and lighting specialists if necessary to build a strong case.

Call 833.88.SHARK or contact Fielding Law today for a free consultation. We are here to fight for your rights and help you recover after a serious crash.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

A person in a car touching a phone

California’s No Touch Phone Law

By Car Accident, Catastrophic Injury, Personal Injury, Truck Accident, Wrongful Death

What Is California’s No Touch Phone Law?

The California no touch phone law makes it illegal for drivers to hold their phones while operating a vehicle. Even holding a phone briefly to check directions or notifications is considered a violation. Phones must be mounted, and use must be hands-free, with only a single swipe or tap allowed. This rule applies whether the driver is moving or stopped in traffic.

When Did the Law Go Into Effect?

California’s no touch phone law became more strictly enforced in June 2025 after a California Court of Appeal decision clarified the intent behind California Vehicle Code § 23123.5. The court confirmed that even briefly holding a phone while driving—without actively texting or calling—violates the law. This ruling strengthened existing distracted driving laws and eliminated common loopholes.

What Does the Law Mean for Drivers?

Drivers in California must now comply with the following:

  • Phones must be mounted on the dashboard or in a lower corner of the windshield

  • Only a single tap or swipe is permitted while driving

  • Voice commands may be used for calls, texts, and navigation

  • Drivers under 18 are prohibited from using phones at all, even hands-free

  • Emergency calls (such as to 911) are permitted

The law applies on all roads, whether you are driving on the freeway, stopped at a light, or in a parking lot.

Penalties and Consequences

The law is subject to primary enforcement, which means law enforcement can stop and cite a driver solely for violating this rule. The penalties include:

  • A base fine of $20 for a first offense, which typically increases to more than $160 after fees

  • A base fine of $50 for subsequent offenses, which may exceed $280 in total cost

Multiple offenses can also result in points on your license and increased insurance premiums.

Why Is This Law Necessary?

Distracted driving is one of the top causes of traffic collisions in California. Research shows that taking your eyes off the road for just five seconds while driving at highway speed is like driving the length of a football field blindfolded. Even quick glances at a phone can lead to serious injuries or fatalities.

Smartphones have made multitasking common, but the risks on the road are too high. This law exists to reduce crashes, protect lives, and make the rules around phone use clear and enforceable.

Tips to Stay Compliant

  • Mount your phone before you begin driving

  • Use hands-free features like voice assistants or Bluetooth

  • Enable “Do Not Disturb While Driving” mode

  • Set your GPS and music before starting the car

  • Pull over safely if you need to interact with your phone

Why Hire Fielding Law

At Fielding Law, we represent individuals who have been injured by distracted drivers throughout California and Arizona. If you were hurt in a car accident caused by someone using their phone behind the wheel, you may be entitled to compensation for medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.

We approach every case with professionalism, care, and a clear focus on helping our clients move forward. You do not have to face the insurance companies or legal process alone.

Contact Fielding Law at 833.88.SHARK today for a free consultation.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

Child with an adult next to a car at sunset

Justice for a Child Car Accident Victim

By Car Accident, Personal Injury

When the Case Is About the Kids

Not every legal win is about the numbers. Sometimes, it is about being there—truly there—when a family needs you most.

After a serious child car accident left a young girl with a fractured clavicle and shook the lives of her mother and brother, Fielding Law stepped in to help the family find clarity and healing. They spoke primarily Spanish, and they were overwhelmed—not just by what happened, but by what came next: paperwork, insurance, and court hearings.

This is where the Minor’s Compromise process began.

What Is a Minor’s Compromise?

In California, when a minor receives a settlement for injuries sustained in a car accident or any other incident, the court must approve the terms. This legal process, called a Minor’s Compromise, is designed to protect the child—both financially and legally.

But the process can feel complicated, especially for families who are already under emotional strain. That is why we take these cases to heart.

Brian Yee and Clark Fielding at Riverside Courthouse for a child car accident case

(Left) Brian Yee, Associate Attorney (Right) Clark Fielding, Founding Principal and Esquire

How We Helped

Attorneys Clark Fielding and Brian Yee personally managed this child car accident case and prepared detailed Minor’s Compromise petitions for the children. Their focus was not just on securing a fair outcome—it was on making the experience feel human, respectful, and understandable for the entire family.

They attended the hearing in person with the clients and arranged a Spanish-speaking interpreter to ensure the family was fully engaged. That presence mattered. The judge acknowledged the professionalism and care in Clark and Brian’s work and praised their lawyering and preparation.

It was a moment that reminded us: showing up with compassion and excellence is part of what justice looks like.

Why Hire Fielding Law

At Fielding Law, we believe families deserve more than just representation—they deserve advocacy that feels personal. We take the time to understand your story, walk beside you through complex legal steps like the Minor’s Compromise process, and always fight for what is best for your child.

If your child has been injured in a car accident, we are here to help you through every step.

Call 833.88.SHARK or contact Fielding Law to learn how we can support you.

Note: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal concerns.

Close Menu